Independent public-opinion data2026 election cycle / Public beta
← All fact-checks
NationalEconomy & pricesAI-assisted check

Food inflation: 12.5% versus 1.9%

Misleading

The two annual rates are supported, but this compares a 2023 peak with a 2026 reading, not whole-term averages. Positive 1.9% inflation still means food prices rose over the preceding year.

Checked Updated

What was claimed

Paraphrase · not a direct quotation · New Zealand National Party

Food inflation was 12.5% under Labour and 1.9% under National.

Original post date not recovered. Original screenshot post date not recovered; relative Facebook timestamps have not been converted to dates. Equivalent dated statements are identified separately.

Why this rating

Both selected annual rates are supported. This compares a 2023 peak with a 2026 reading, not whole-term average inflation.

A 1.9% positive inflation rate means the food price level was higher than a year earlier. It does not mean the average grocery basket became cheaper.

The numbers and definitions

Selected annual rates

Claim stated
12.5% versus 1.9%
Evidence
Difference: 10.6 percentage points, between two annual growth rates
Period / measure
June 2023 versus June 2022; July/August 2026 versus the same months of 2025

Stats NZ · Stats NZ · Stats NZ

Prices versus inflation

Evidence
1.9% positive annual inflation means food prices were still higher than a year earlier
Period / measure
This is not a cumulative price-level or whole-government-term comparison

Stats NZ · Stats NZ · Stats NZ

Missing context and limits
  • The ad’s chosen month is unstated and its post date is unknown; either July or August 2026 fits 1.9%.
  • No cumulative party-term food-price-level change or causal contribution of government policy was calculated.
  • This check covers the stated assertion, not every claim in the source image.

Primary sources and verification

AI-assisted review: the supplied assertion and the listed primary documents were inspected, definitions and periods compared, and any numerical calculations reproduced. Indexed-only sources and inaccessible original post dates are identified in the source notes; no external human editorial review is recorded.

Food prices hit second peakNational Party · party statement

Corroborates the 12.5% component; this is not the 2026 comparison ad’s permalink.

Data period: June 2023 annual food inflation. Published 13 Jul 2023. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Food prices increase 12.5 percent annuallyStats NZ · official statistics

Search-indexed official text checked; direct page opening returned an iframe shell.

Data period: June 2023 versus June 2022. Published 13 Jul 2023. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Selected price indexes: August 2026Stats NZ · official statistics

The official release table gives a 0.3% monthly food-price increase and 1.9% annual increase. The table was read from indexed official text because the full webpage could not be retrieved. The dated release is 18 September 2026.

Data period: August 2026 versus August 2025, and monthly August versus July 2026. Published 18 Sept 2026. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
International airfares continue to rise in August 2026Stats NZ · official statistics

Official indexed text states both July and August annual food-price increases were 1.9%; this pass did not verify the news page publication date.

Data period: July and August 2026 annual food-price changes. Published 18 Sept 2026. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Correction and revision history · 1 version
  1. Version 1 · 13 Oct 2026Misleading

    Initial AI-assisted source review and publication.

    The two annual rates are supported, but this compares a 2023 peak with a 2026 reading, not whole-term averages. Positive 1.9% inflation still means food prices rose over the preceding year.

    Statement and sources in this version

    Food inflation was 12.5% under Labour and 1.9% under National.

Published conclusions are retained when a new version changes the explanation or rating.

How we fact-check

We select specific, testable assertions from attributable statements and reader submissions. National and Labour face the same criteria. This is selected coverage, not a party scorecard or a claim that every campaign statement has been checked.

Evidence and ratings

We prioritise original statistics, legislation, agency documents and parliamentary records. A party’s statement establishes what it said; it is not independent proof against another party. For claims about a published plan, a reproduced calculation establishes its arithmetic, not whether its forecasts will happen.

True
The material factual assertion is supported by strong evidence.
Mostly True
Substantially correct, with relatively minor qualifications.
Mixed
Contains materially accurate and inaccurate elements.
Misleading
Missing context, framing or an inappropriate comparison materially distorts the assertion.
False
The material assertion is contradicted by reliable evidence.
Unverified
Reliable evidence is insufficient to establish a conclusion.

Context matters

Checks identify the period, publication date and definition of each measure. We distinguish headcount from full-time equivalents, price levels from inflation, adjusted from unadjusted statistics, and forecasts from results. Promises, predictions and opinions are labelled and receive no factual accuracy rating.

AI-assisted research and independence

The initial reports use AI-assisted research and calculations. Each report explains the sources read and the limits of its verification. External human editorial review has not been recorded for this initial batch. Sponsorship and newsletter distribution cannot change a verdict or replace the evidence requirements.

Corrections and incomplete information

Unresolved assertions remain Unverified or private drafts. A changed public conclusion retains the earlier rating, explanation and dated revision reason in its correction history. Readers can submit evidence, report an error or appeal a rating using the form below. Submissions require review before publication.

Checks describe the evidence available on their verification date. New statistics or a later policy announcement may change the answer; a later document does not establish what was true on an unknown earlier posting date.

Report an error or appeal this check

Help us check an attributable statement or review new evidence. A submission is a research lead, not a published verdict.