Independent public-opinion data2026 election cycle / Public beta
← All fact-checks
NationalTaxAI-assisted check

National’s nine-tax graphic: real proposals, unresolved counting

Unverified

The parties propose real tax changes, but the nine-label count is not independently established. It mixes new tax bases, existing rate changes and overlapping categories; the reviewed papers do not establish one agreed coalition package.

Checked Updated

What was claimed

Paraphrase · not a direct quotation · New Zealand National Party

Labour and its allies propose nine new taxes: capital gains, assets, a 45% top rate, inheritance, digital, gifts, business, rentals and land.

Original post date not recovered. Original screenshot post date not recovered; relative Facebook timestamps have not been converted to dates. Equivalent dated statements are identified separately.

Why this rating

Unverified for the precise count of nine distinct new taxes. The graphic supplies nine labels but no item-by-item policy references or counting rule. The policy examples below explain relevant proposals; they are not a claimed reconstruction of National’s intended mapping.

Labour’s property capital-gains proposal covers future gains on commercial and residential investment property, with family homes and farms exempt. Te Pāti Māori’s paper includes graduated wealth rates, a higher company rate, land-banking and other measures. Opportunity proposes an annual land tax. These are separate party programmes.

The Greens put gifts and inheritances within one capital-acquisitions proposal. Their higher top income and company rates change existing taxes; their digital withholding proposal is framed as enforcement. Splitting categories or calling every amendment a new tax changes the counting convention.

IRD confirms that income tax, company tax and rental-income taxation already exist. A proposal to increase a rate or alter deductions can create additional liabilities without creating a distinct tax instrument.

This review neither establishes that opposition parties propose no other taxes nor replaces nine with a different total. A final count requires National’s references and a stated rule for treating shared proposals, rate changes, exemptions and enforcement.

The numbers and definitions

Capital-gains label

Claim stated
Capital gains tax
Evidence
Labour: 28% on future commercial/investment-property gains after 1 July 2027; home and farm exempt.
Period / measure
Proposal, not enacted

New Zealand Labour Party

Asset label

Claim stated
Asset tax
Evidence
Green wealth proposal: 2.5% above $10m, family home exempt. Te Pāti Māori has different graduated wealth settings.
Period / measure
Separate proposals; example mapping only

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · Te Pāti Māori

45% label

Claim stated
45% top rate
Evidence
Green proposal: marginal 45% above $160,000. Existing income tax already has a 39% top band.
Period / measure
Proposed rate change

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · Inland Revenue

Inheritance and gift labels

Claim stated
Two labelled taxes
Evidence
Green paper puts both under one 33% capital-acquisitions proposal above $1m, with home/farm exemptions.
Period / measure
One proposal covering two transfer categories

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Digital label

Claim stated
Digital tax
Evidence
Green paper describes 5% withholding enforcement; Te Pāti Māori proposes 5% on profits transferred offshore.
Period / measure
Different proposals; intended mapping unconfirmed

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · Te Pāti Māori

Business label

Claim stated
Business tax
Evidence
Green: 33% for companies above $30m turnover. Te Pāti Māori: 33% company rate. Existing standard rate: 28%.
Period / measure
Changes to existing company tax

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · Te Pāti Māori · Inland Revenue

Rentals label

Claim stated
Rentals tax
Evidence
Rental income already incurs income tax. The graphic does not identify whether this label means deductions, land-sale rules or another instrument.
Period / measure
Intended policy not specified

Inland Revenue

Land label

Claim stated
Land tax
Evidence
Opportunity proposes 1.75% urban / 0.5% rural annually; Te Pāti Māori separately proposes a land-banking measure.
Period / measure
Different bases; not one agreed coalition rate

Opportunity Party · Te Pāti Māori

Missing context and limits
  • National’s item-by-item mapping, calculation date and definition of a new tax were not recovered. The examples are possible matches, not definitive assignments to its nine labels.
  • The reviewed policy papers do not establish an agreed future coalition tax programme. Alternative or overlapping proposals must not automatically be treated as cumulative.
  • This is not a household-cost forecast or a full enumeration of every tax proposal from the parties.
  • The original screenshot’s publication date remains unknown; live policy papers may have changed since it was posted.

Primary sources and verification

AI-assisted review: inspected the supplied graphic, full Green, Te Pāti Māori and Opportunity tax papers, Labour’s CGT page and IRD’s current tax definitions. Verified the stated proposal examples and category overlap. National’s complete nine-item mapping remains unavailable, so the numerical count is Unverified. No external human editorial review occurred.

No new taxes under NationalNational Party · party statement

Data period: 2026 election coalition-tax claim. Publication date not stated. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Capital Gains Tax to Level the Playing Field for Businesses, Create Jobs and Fix New Zealand’s Health SystemNew Zealand Labour Party · party statement

Data period: 28% proposed property CGT on gains after 1 July 2027. Publication date not stated. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
A tax system for all of us – 2026 tax policyGreen Party of Aotearoa New Zealand · party statement

Full official party PDF read. Relevant tax definitions are on physical PDF pages 5–9; it is primary evidence of Green proposals, not independent evidence of their economic effects.

Data period: Proposed 2027/28–2030/31 tax settings. Publication date not stated. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
It’s time for a Tax ResetOpportunity Party · party statement

Source states May 2026; do not infer a day. Land tax is 1.75% urban and 0.5% rural.

Data period: Proposed transition/full-implementation Tax Reset. Publication date not stated. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Tax PolicyTe Pāti Māori · party statement

Official tax index links the full Manifesto 2026 tax paper, retrieved separately in this review.

Data period: Current tax-policy index linking Manifesto 2026 paper. Publication date not stated. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Manifesto 2026 — Te Pāti Māori tax policyTe Pāti Māori · party statement

Downloaded the publicly linked full five-page PDF. Physical page 3 (printed page 5) gives income, wealth, company and land-banking rates. No exact publication day was stated.

Data period: 2026 manifesto proposals. Publication date not stated. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Tax rates for individualsInland Revenue · official record

Current graduated income tax has a 39% top rate above $180,000. Rental income is already included in taxable income.

Data period: Current settings from 1 April 2025. Publication date not stated. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Tax rates for businessesInland Revenue · official record

Most companies currently pay 28% income tax.

Data period: Current company tax guidance. Publication date not stated. Accessed 13 Oct 2026.

Read the source ↗
Correction and revision history · 1 version
  1. Version 1 · 13 Oct 2026Unverified

    Initial AI-assisted source review and publication.

    The parties propose real tax changes, but the nine-label count is not independently established. It mixes new tax bases, existing rate changes and overlapping categories; the reviewed papers do not establish one agreed coalition package.

    Statement and sources in this version

    Labour and its allies propose nine new taxes: capital gains, assets, a 45% top rate, inheritance, digital, gifts, business, rentals and land.

Published conclusions are retained when a new version changes the explanation or rating.

How we fact-check

We select specific, testable assertions from attributable statements and reader submissions. National and Labour face the same criteria. This is selected coverage, not a party scorecard or a claim that every campaign statement has been checked.

Evidence and ratings

We prioritise original statistics, legislation, agency documents and parliamentary records. A party’s statement establishes what it said; it is not independent proof against another party. For claims about a published plan, a reproduced calculation establishes its arithmetic, not whether its forecasts will happen.

True
The material factual assertion is supported by strong evidence.
Mostly True
Substantially correct, with relatively minor qualifications.
Mixed
Contains materially accurate and inaccurate elements.
Misleading
Missing context, framing or an inappropriate comparison materially distorts the assertion.
False
The material assertion is contradicted by reliable evidence.
Unverified
Reliable evidence is insufficient to establish a conclusion.

Context matters

Checks identify the period, publication date and definition of each measure. We distinguish headcount from full-time equivalents, price levels from inflation, adjusted from unadjusted statistics, and forecasts from results. Promises, predictions and opinions are labelled and receive no factual accuracy rating.

AI-assisted research and independence

The initial reports use AI-assisted research and calculations. Each report explains the sources read and the limits of its verification. External human editorial review has not been recorded for this initial batch. Sponsorship and newsletter distribution cannot change a verdict or replace the evidence requirements.

Corrections and incomplete information

Unresolved assertions remain Unverified or private drafts. A changed public conclusion retains the earlier rating, explanation and dated revision reason in its correction history. Readers can submit evidence, report an error or appeal a rating using the form below. Submissions require review before publication.

Checks describe the evidence available on their verification date. New statistics or a later policy announcement may change the answer; a later document does not establish what was true on an unknown earlier posting date.

Report an error or appeal this check

Help us check an attributable statement or review new evidence. A submission is a research lead, not a published verdict.