Independent public-opinion data2026 election cycle / Public beta
CAMPAIGN GUIDE · NEW ZEALAND 2026

Compare the parties.

See the proposals, follow the funding and read the evidence.

7 parties67 selected policy summariesChecked

Proposals and forecasts are party claims. Our checks trace the sources and arithmetic; coalition agreements may change delivery.

Reset
START WITH AN ISSUE

See the choices together.

Housing

Buying, renting, building and public housing.

1 summary · 1 party

National

1 summary

Widen access to 5% home deposits

Raise the First Home Loan income cap to $300,000, keeping the lender’s affordability test for a 5% deposit.

2026 election policyParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • Widens access to an existing low-deposit scheme while retaining lenders' affordability checks, addressing the deposit hurdle for more eligible buyers.Evidence
Trade-offs & risks
  • A 5% deposit means a larger loan for the same home. Borrowers still pay mortgage-insurance costs and must meet lending requirements.Evidence
Open questions
  • When would the expansion start, and what fiscal period does the $4–6m estimate cover?Evidence

Party proposal

National would raise the First Home Loan income cap to $300,000 for all applicant types. Eligible buyers could use a 5% deposit, while lenders would still decide whether they can afford the mortgage.

Who it covers
Eligible first-home buyers within the proposed income cap. A smaller deposit does not remove the lender’s affordability test or guarantee approval.
Timing
Proposed for a re-elected government; no implementation date is specified in the reviewed sources.
Cost & funding stated by the party
The party paper estimates a fiscal impact of $4–6 million, funded from existing budgets. It does not specify an annual or multi-year period for that estimate.
Sources reviewed
National: First Home Loan access Policy page · Publication date not stated
National: first-home buyer policy (PDF) Policy paper · Publication date not stated

Selected coverage, not a ranking of policy quality. How we review the sources

Back to guide navigation ↑