Complete historical claims, then close the Tribunal
Keep eligible historical Treaty claims until completed, end contemporary Tribunal inquiries and close it after that work, alongside stronger statutory property-rights protections.
Our assessment & details
Our assessment
AnalysisStrengths
- Linking closure to completed claims rather than an arbitrary date provides an explicit safeguard against cutting historical cases short.Evidence 1Evidence 2
Trade-offs & risks
- Ending contemporary jurisdiction removes a Treaty-specific avenue for reviewing current Crown conduct. Proposed property protections address only part of that wider remit.Evidence 1Evidence 2
Open questions
- Explain pending contemporary cases, affordable court access and how declining funding would still complete historical work properly; transition costs are not quantified.Evidence 1Evidence 2
Party proposal
ACT would end the Waitangi Tribunal's contemporary jurisdiction, retain historical claims lodged by 1 September 2008 and disestablish the Tribunal once that work finishes. It also proposes adding property-rights protections to the Bill of Rights Act, with claims against the Crown pursued through ordinary courts.
- Who it covers
- Historical Treaty claimants, people raising contemporary Crown grievances, property owners and the Tribunal.
- Timing
- Closure depends on completing eligible historical claims, with no fixed calendar deadline.
- Cost & funding stated by the party
- The full paper says funding would reduce with the remaining workload, but quantifies neither savings nor transition costs. The consolidated plan has no separate Tribunal line.