Independent public-opinion data2026 election cycle / Public beta
CAMPAIGN GUIDE · NEW ZEALAND 2026

Compare the parties.

See the proposals, follow the funding and read the evidence.

7 parties67 selected policy summariesChecked

Proposals and forecasts are party claims. Our checks trace the sources and arithmetic; coalition agreements may change delivery.

Reset
START WITH AN ISSUE

See the choices together.

Energy & climate

Electricity, emissions and energy resilience.

8 summaries · 7 parties

ACT

1 summary

More electricity investment and connection choices

Expand solar export and connection choices, allow household power sales to a different provider, and encourage electricity investment.

Current policy positionParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • Buying and selling through different providers, and competing connection contractors, could expand options for solar households and new generators.Evidence
Trade-offs & risks
  • Solar exports still depend on network capacity. Users of private transmission lines would pay agreed charges, with technical protections continuing.Evidence
Open questions
  • The page sets no implementation timetable or public cost; the rules for metering, tariffs and consumer protection need detail.Evidence

Party proposal

ACT proposes letting households sell power to a different provider from the one they buy from, allowing more solar exports where networks have capacity, and opening eligible connection work to competition. It opposes forced break-ups of major electricity companies.

Who it covers
Households generating electricity, new generators and electricity customers. Technical standards, metering, network charges and consumer protections would apply.
Timing
No implementation date specified in the reviewed source.
Cost & funding stated by the party
Investors would finance private transmission lines, with users paying through voluntary agreements. No total public cost is specified in the reviewed page.
Sources reviewed
ACT: electricity investment and competition Policy page · Publication date not stated

Green Party

1 summary

Kiwipower, community energy and household solar

Create public Kiwipower, fund community renewables and support household solar with zero-interest loans, while transitioning away from fossil fuels.

2026 election policyParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • Household, public-housing and community projects could widen access to clean energy; specified funding and a four-year solar target improve accountability.Evidence 1Evidence 2
Trade-offs & risks
  • New public generation exposes the Crown to investment and delivery risk. Fossil-fuel restrictions require renewable supply and dry-year alternatives to arrive in time.Evidence 1Evidence 2
Open questions
  • Specify Kiwipower’s capital, the funds’ fiscal periods and loan terms, and publish a costed delivery and security-of-supply plan.Evidence 1Evidence 2

Party proposal

The Greens propose publicly owned Kiwipower to invest in renewable generation and dry-year security; zero-interest solar and battery loans; renter solar rights; and expanded Warmer Kiwi Homes. They would invest in community and Māori renewable energy, put solar on more than half of public homes within four years, establish a single energy regulator and Ministry for Energy, ban new fossil-fuel extraction, end fossil-fuel subsidies and cancel the LNG terminal.

Who it covers
Electricity users, public-housing tenants, renters, low-income households and Māori/community energy projects, alongside generators and industry.
Timing
The announcement targets solar on more than half of public homes within four years. No calendar rollout or fiscal period for all other elements is stated in the reviewed announcement and chapter.
Cost & funding stated by the party
The announcement specifies $200m for community-owned renewable energy and $80m for Māori housing renewables, without labelling either amount annual. It proposes funding through corporation and high-wealth tax changes. No total package cost or Kiwipower capital allocation is given in those sources; solar loans would be repaid.

The renewable infrastructure agency in the manifesto and Kiwipower in the announcement may describe overlapping roles; their institutional relationship is not defined in those two sources. The $200m and $80m commitments must not be shown as annual costs.

Sources reviewed
Greens: 2026 manifesto — energy Manifesto chapter · Publication date not stated
Greens: Kiwipower and clean-energy package Announcement · Published

Labour

1 summary

Finance and subsidies for household solar

Offer repayable solar finance, grants for eligible households, renter options and community batteries.

2026 election policyParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • Finance, grants, renter options and community batteries address different upfront-cost barriers; the $160m package identifies its funding source.Evidence
Trade-offs & risks
  • Household loans remain repayable, and funding is moved from gas-security provision to solar support, changing the use of that money.Evidence
Open questions
  • Exact income thresholds, loan rates and terms, and the assumptions behind repayments staying below each household’s savings need detail.Evidence

Party proposal

Labour proposes government-backed solar finance, grants of up to $3,000 for eligible households, rules enabling plug-in solar for renters and a community battery fund. The loans would be repaid over time rather than making the equipment free.

Who it covers
Homeowners, renters and communities. The kickstart grants are for lower- and middle-income households; the page does not give exact income thresholds.
Timing
Advice, subsidies and the two loan schemes operating within 12 months of taking office.
Cost & funding stated by the party
Labour publishes $160 million over four years, repurposed from the Gas Security of Supply fund. This includes $77 million for household subsidies and $30 million for community batteries.
Sources reviewed
Labour: SolarSaver Policy page · Publication date not stated

National

1 summary

Property-backed loans for home electrification

Offer long-term, property-secured loans for solar, batteries, insulation and heat pumps. Borrowers repay them.

2026 election policyParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • Spreads approved equipment costs over ten years through a specified financing mechanism, reducing the upfront payment for eligible property owners.Evidence
Trade-offs & risks
  • Households take on property-secured debt. Renters, owners below 20% equity and households in non-participating councils cannot access this loan scheme.Evidence
Open questions
  • What interest rates, affordability checks and launch timetable would apply, and which councils would participate?Evidence

Party proposal

National proposes a Home Energy Fund offering long-term loans for solar, batteries, insulation and heat pumps. Loans would be secured against the property and repaid through rates or on sale. It would also relax consent rules for small-scale renewable energy.

Who it covers
Ratepayers with at least 20% equity in their property, in participating councils. Council participation would be voluntary.
Timing
Loans repaid over ten years. The reviewed paper does not specify a programme launch date.
Cost & funding stated by the party
The paper proposes a one-off $7 million Crown equity investment for a 20% shareholding, with remaining investment from councils and the Local Government Funding Agency. Borrowers repay the loans.
Sources reviewed
National: Home Energy Fund Policy page · Publication date not stated
National: home electrification policy (PDF) Policy paper · Publication date not stated

NZ First

2 summaries

Separate power generation from retailing

Separate major power companies’ generation and retail businesses and change electricity-market rules.

2026 election policyParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • Long-term fixed-price contracts could make revenues clearer for new generators, while separating generation and retailing directly addresses the party's stated competition concern.Evidence
Trade-offs & risks
  • Guarantees and priority dispatch create obligations that need allocating; splitting companies also requires a major market transition.Evidence
Open questions
  • What would guarantees cost, how would equal solar buy/sell prices work, and how would restructuring be sequenced?Evidence

Party proposal

NZ First proposes splitting major power companies into generators and retailers, changing electricity-market rules, and a national energy strategy. It would guarantee long-term fixed-price contracts for new generation and propose equal buy and sell rates for household-generated power.

Who it covers
Electricity customers, new generators and households generating power, such as rooftop solar owners.
Timing
No implementation date specified in the reviewed source.
Cost & funding stated by the party
The party proposes government guarantees for new generation. The reviewed page does not state a total cost or funding source.
Sources reviewed
NZ First: electricity-market proposal Policy page · Publication date not stated

Domestic fuel-security surveys

Invest in subsurface surveys and domestic fuel-security infrastructure over the next term.

2026 election policyParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • A shared subsurface dataset and 12/24-month survey milestones make the initial research phase more concrete.Evidence
Trade-offs & risks
  • Public spending of $1bn precedes any proven commercial return. Surveys alone do not deliver fuel production or secure energy supply.Evidence
Open questions
  • What analysis supports the claimed over-90% discovery chance, what funds the surveys, and what are later development costs and safeguards?Evidence

Party proposal

NZ First proposes a National Subsurface Development Survey to identify domestic resources and support fuel security.

Who it covers
The energy system, survey organisations and potential domestic resource projects. A survey allocation is not approval or funding for every later development.
Timing
Initial results within 12 months and surveys of highest-ranked basins within 24 months; the investment is over a government term.
Cost & funding stated by the party
An initial $1bn over the term is proposed. No annual allocation or funding source is specified.
Sources reviewed
NZ First: fuel security Policy page · Publication date not stated

Opportunity (TOP)

1 summary

A long-term renewable electricity strategy

Seek a long-term renewable-electricity strategy, support household electrification and change market oversight.

2026 election policyParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • Combines a long-term generation target with household finance and community projects, addressing both electricity supply and upfront electrification costs.Evidence
Trade-offs & risks
  • Ring-fencing power-company dividends removes about $500m annually from general Crown revenue. Household loans remain repayable; regulatory consolidation also needs a transition.Evidence
Open questions
  • What replaces the diverted revenue, and how would annual investment, network capacity and dry-year backup keep pace with the generation target?Evidence

Party proposal

Opportunity would seek cross-party agreement on 30 gigawatts of total electricity capacity by 2050, support household electrification loans and community energy projects, combine energy regulators, and consolidate management of electricity distributors.

Who it covers
Electricity customers, generators, communities and industries moving to electric processes.
Timing
The capacity target is for 2050. The reviewed page does not give a timetable for each market reform.
Cost & funding stated by the party
Opportunity proposes ring-fencing government electricity-company dividends, described as around $500 million a year, and using future emissions-trading revenue for industry electrification. It acknowledges a loss of general Crown revenue that would need replacement.
Sources reviewed
Opportunity: Abundant Energy Policy page · Publication date not stated

Te Pāti Māori

1 summary

An energy sovereignty fund

Create a $1bn Energy Sovereignty Fund for Māori ownership, capability and energy projects.

2026 election policyParty source
Our assessment & details

Our assessment

Analysis
Strengths
  • Multiple financing tools and workforce support could help Māori ownership and rural energy capability, rather than relying on grants alone.Evidence
Trade-offs & risks
  • Loans, guarantees and equity expose the Crown to different financial risks. A $1bn fund is not equivalent to $1bn of grants.Evidence
Open questions
  • What funds the investment, over what period, and which selection criteria, financial safeguards and measurable milestones would govern it?Evidence

Party proposal

Te Pāti Māori proposes a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund, a national energy independence plan, Māori energy workforce development, stronger rural energy capability and regulation focused on the public interest.

Who it covers
Māori energy workers, owners and industry, rural communities and the energy system. The paper includes grants, concessional finance, guarantees and equity/co-investment mechanisms.
Timing
Energy Sovereignty objective by 2035. Quantified targets and five-year milestones would be developed through the proposed National Energy Plan.
Cost & funding stated by the party
A $1bn fund is proposed, without a specified funding source or expenditure period. Different finance mechanisms should not all be counted as grants.
Sources reviewed
Te Pāti Māori: energy sovereignty announcement Announcement · Published
Te Pāti Māori: full 2026 energy paper Policy paper · Publication date not stated

Selected coverage, not a ranking of policy quality. How we review the sources

Back to guide navigation ↑